Home Similar Companies TER
Structural Similarity · Functional Peers

Companies Similar to Teradyne, Inc.

Stocks with a similar structural profile to Teradyne, Inc. (TER) — identified by trajectory similarity across revenue dynamics, margin structure, and capital efficiency patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

11 similar companies · Updated 2026-04-05 · TER full analysis → peer cluster →

Companies similar to Teradyne, Inc. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in growth. Examples in this group include QUALCOMM Incorporated, Lam Research Corporation, VAT Group AG.

Structurally similar companies — ranked by functional peer similarity
# Company Growth Quality Valuation
#1
32
83
79
TER vs QCOM
#2
75
81
38
TER vs LRCX
#3
41
76
18
TER vs VACN.SW
#4
68
11
55
TER vs TEL
#5
75
82
67
TER vs LOGN.SW
#6
51
92
60
TER vs AAPL
#7
37
72
56
TER vs AMAT
#8
82
16
34
TER vs KEYS
#9
80
52
83
TER vs DELL
#10
42
76
86
TER vs MLI
#11
34
59
48
TER vs NHY.OL
Direct comparisons — TER vs each similar company

Full peer analysis for TER in AssetNext

Interactive similarity view, compare tool and portfolio context for Teradyne, Inc..

Explore TER in AssetNext →
Explore similar companies for each peer

Each company above has its own structural peer group. Explore the network:

Similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on trajectory analysis of revenue dynamics, margin structure and capital efficiency patterns over time. Not investment advice. Not based on sector classification alone.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.