Home Companies QCOM
Technology · Semiconductors · Peer Analysis

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) — Structural Peer Analysis

QUALCOMM Incorporated ranks near the peer group median, with valuation as the main structural pillar while the other dimensions offer less support. That creates a tension: current price behavior looks stronger than the structural profile would suggest.

Updated 2026-05-17 · NASDAQ100
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)98th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Profitability 33
Below median
Weak Stability 41
Around median
Moderate Growth 47
Around median
Strongest Valuation 86
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
54
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

QCOM’s Diversification Premium Faces Volatility Test

Qualcomm designs and supplies semiconductor chips and telecommunications equipment, with a core business in mobile devices and expanding exposure to AI, automotive, and IoT markets.

QCOM is priced on diversification, not on cycle risk. The market’s focus on new growth drivers means that even with a 41.7% one-year volatility—high for a quality semiconductor—the valuation reflects expansion beyond handsets, as QCOM’s revenue is increasingly tied to AI, automotive, and IoT. The company has a 29.3% operating margin and is actively expanding into new segments, making it more than just a smartphone supplier. The market assigns QCOM a premium for its exposure to AI and automotive, and prices the stock to reward progress in these areas—yet any disappointment in these segments is swiftly reflected in the share price, with a sharp rerating following setbacks in AI or automotive growth.

AssetNext · 2026-05-14 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how QCOM compares across its peer group

Break down QCOM's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare QCOM with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.