Home Companies MLI
Industrials · Metal Fabrication · Peer Analysis

Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) — Structural Peer Analysis

Mueller Industries, Inc. ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with valuation as the main structural support while growth remains the clearest constraint.

Updated 2026-08-16 · RUSSELL1000
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)95th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 56
Above median
Weak Stability 59
Above median
Moderate Profitability 79
Top 25% of peers
Strongest Valuation 86
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
72
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

Discounted for Cyclical Margin Risks

Mueller Industries manufactures copper, brass, and aluminum products, specializing in piping and industrial metals.

The market prices Mueller Industries based on its sensitivity to near-term cycles and margin leverage, actively discounting the stock whenever quality stability appears uncertain. Despite robust revenue growth of 25.5% year-on-year, persistent margin pressure—operating margin at 8.2%—from volatile raw material costs leads investors to react swiftly to shifts in input prices, rather than rewarding any perceived defensive qualities. Unlike many industrial peers, Mueller’s heavy dependence on copper and brass prices amplifies these margin risks in the current cycle, so the discount persists even as top-line momentum is strong. The market only partially rewards short-term outperformance, and only a sustained stabilization of margins despite raw material swings would change this valuation framing.

AssetNext · 2026-08-06 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how MLI compares across its peer group

Break down MLI's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare MLI with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.