Home Companies DASH Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to DoorDash, Inc.

12 companies structurally similar to DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · DASH full analysis →

Companies similar to DoorDash, Inc. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in growth. Examples in this group include Delivery Hero SE, Flutter Entertainment plc, On Holding AG.

Reference company
DASH
DoorDash, Inc.
Peer score: 39
Dimension scores
Growth
95
Quality
28
Valuation
27
Stability
20
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
DHER.DE · Consumer Cyclical
41
#2
FLUT · Consumer Cyclical
50
#3
ONON · Consumer Cyclical
26
#4
AS · Consumer Cyclical
41
#5
TOST · Technology
42
#6
DKNG · Consumer Cyclical
47
#7
IOT · Technology
46
#8
MELI · Consumer Cyclical
49
#9
SHOP · Technology
34
#10
MDB · Technology
37
#11
PODD · Healthcare
50
#12
VRT · Industrials
56
Direct comparisons — DASH vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Consumer Cyclical rankings

See how DoorDash, Inc. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore DASH peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore DASH peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.