MongoDB, Inc. ranks below the peer group median, with profitability as the least supportive dimension. Recent price action is broadly in line with the structural positioning.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
MongoDB, Inc. develops and provides a NoSQL database platform and related services. The company operates at the intersection of cloud infrastructure and modern data management.
MongoDB is priced as a growth bet, not a quality stock. With an operating margin of just 3.2% (well below peer median), the market focuses on the company’s rapid revenue expansion rather than profitability and efficiency—every positive development supports the growth narrative, so business weaknesses have limited impact on the valuation. MongoDB benefits from NoSQL architecture and AI/ML demand, but remains weak on margins and efficiency. The market’s willingness to pay for momentum is evident in the stock’s 1Y volatility of 54.8% (top decile): investors react strongly to any shift in sentiment or results, amplifying price swings. A growth slowdown or margin disappointment is enough to trigger a sharp rerating.
Break down MDB's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.