Union Pacific Corporation's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | UNP peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Norfolk Southern Corporation
|
48 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs CSX Corporation
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Constellation Brands, Inc.
|
41 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Thomson Reuters Corporation
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Linde plc
|
74 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
|
53 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Copart, Inc.
|
63 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
|
71 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Antero Midstream Corporation
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Union Pacific Corporation vs Aker BP ASA
|
22 | Compare → |
View the complete Union Pacific Corporation report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.