TeamViewer SE's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | TMV.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
TeamViewer SE vs SAP SE
|
51 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Adobe Inc.
|
73 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Fair Isaac Corporation
|
63 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Intuit Inc.
|
58 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Paychex, Inc.
|
76 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
|
49 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs The Sage Group plc
|
59 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Autodesk, Inc.
|
56 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Bentley Systems, Incorporated
|
46 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs GoDaddy Inc.
|
69 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs F5, Inc.
|
65 | Compare → |
|
TeamViewer SE vs Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
|
75 | Compare → |
View the complete TeamViewer SE report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.