TeamViewer SE ranks slightly below the peer group median, with valuation as the main structural pillar while the other dimensions offer less support. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.
AI Momentum Drives TeamViewer’s Volatility Premium
52w drawdown -48.5% · 21d vs sector -4.9%
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
TeamViewer SE develops software for remote connectivity and digital workplace solutions, enabling users to access and control devices from anywhere. The company serves businesses across industries with a focus on secure, scalable digital operations.
TeamViewer is priced as an AI story, not a defensive software compounder. With a 41% operating margin anchoring solid fundamentals, the market still ties valuation to AI momentum—because TeamViewer rapidly expands its product suite with new AI features, every incremental advance is read as a momentum signal, making even minor AI news trigger sharp price swings. The company’s focus on autonomous endpoint management and fast AI integration amplifies this pattern, as the market consistently rewards short-term AI progress with premium pricing, while consistently assigning less valuation premium to the company’s stable core business fundamentals. At 54.3% one-year volatility, TeamViewer trades at the higher end of the software sector’s risk spectrum, with a single slowdown in AI feature momentum enough to trigger sharp repricing.
Break down TMV.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.