Home Companies HUBS
Technology · Software - Application · Peer Analysis

HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) — Structural Peer Analysis

HubSpot, Inc. ranks among the weaker positions in its peer group, with a split structural profile: strong growth, but weak profitability and valuation. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price action is lagging the structural profile — current market behavior is not yet confirming the structural position.

Updated 2026-04-05 · RUSSELL1000
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 9
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Stability 12
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Profitability 20
Bottom 25% of peers
Strongest Growth 88
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
29
Peer-Score
Below-average peer position
Signal qualityHigh

Explore how HUBS compares across its peer group

Break down HUBS's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare HUBS with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.