Home Similar Companies Similar to MPWR Margin & Quality Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Margin & Quality Profile

Companies with a Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.-like Margin & Quality Profile

25 companies with high margin and capital efficiency comparable to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 79 · Updated 2026-04-05 · All companies similar to MPWR →

Reference
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Margin & Quality Profile score
79

Score range used for matching: 67–91

Companies with a similar margin and capital efficiency profile to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Ranked by closeness of quality score to MPWR's reference score of 79. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Margin & Quality Profile
#1
GILD · Healthcare similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#2
AEE · Utilities similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#3
FAST · Industrials similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#4
UTHR · Healthcare similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#5
HO.PA · Industrials similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#6
CW · Industrials similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#7
ELISA.HE · Communication Services similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#8
SPOT · Communication Services similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#9
WRT1V.HE · Industrials similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#10
ASML · Technology similar →
79(+0)
MPWR vs ASML Analysis
#11
AIR.PA · Industrials similar →
79(+0)
Analysis
#12
OHI · Real Estate similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#13
HIG · Financial Services similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#14
ORLY · Consumer Cyclical similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#15
ADP · Technology similar →
80(+1)
Analysis
#16
VLTO · Industrials similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#17
VRTX · Healthcare similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#18
EBAY · Consumer Cyclical similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#19
GDDY · Technology similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
#20
WBS · Financial Services similar →
78(−1)
Analysis
Compare MPWR with trajectory matches
Other MPWR trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..

Explore MPWR in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.