Home Similar Companies Similar to MPWR Valuation Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Valuation Profile

Companies with a Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.-like Valuation Profile

25 companies with similar peer-relative valuation positioning comparable to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 26 · Updated 2026-04-05 · All companies similar to MPWR →

Reference
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Valuation Profile score
26

Score range used for matching: 14–38

Companies with a similar peer-relative valuation to Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Ranked by closeness of valuation score to MPWR's reference score of 26. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Valuation Profile
#1
EA · Communication Services similar →
26(+0)
Analysis
#2
VST · Utilities similar →
26(+0)
Analysis
#3
WBD · Communication Services similar →
26(+0)
Analysis
#4
PUM.DE · Consumer Cyclical similar →
26(+0)
Analysis
#5
PANW · Technology similar →
25(−1)
Analysis
#6
PEN · Healthcare similar →
25(−1)
Analysis
#7
EQIX · Real Estate similar →
27(+1)
Analysis
#8
FER.MC · Industrials similar →
27(+1)
Analysis
#9
DASH · Consumer Cyclical similar →
27(+1)
Analysis
#10
NOKIA.HE · Technology similar →
25(−1)
Analysis
#11
DSFIR.AS · Basic Materials similar →
27(+1)
Analysis
#12
XPO · Industrials similar →
25(−1)
Analysis
#13
LOTB.BR · Consumer Defensive similar →
28(+2)
Analysis
#14
HLE.DE · Consumer Cyclical similar →
28(+2)
Analysis
#15
VRT · Industrials similar →
24(−2)
Analysis
#16
AMD · Technology similar →
28(+2)
MPWR vs AMD Analysis
#17
BA · Industrials similar →
24(−2)
Analysis
#18
GLW · Technology similar →
24(−2)
Analysis
#19
FIS · Technology similar →
28(+2)
Analysis
#20
DPLM.L · Industrials similar →
28(+2)
Analysis
Compare MPWR with trajectory matches
Other MPWR trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..

Explore MPWR in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.