Home Companies CHTR
Communication Services · Telecom Services · Peer Analysis

Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) — Structural Peer Analysis

Charter Communications, Inc. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with strong valuation offset by weak stability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.

Updated 2026-05-17 · NASDAQ100
ENTRY TODAY
Lower price zonebelow norm
TODAY (5y history)<1st pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically lower range and its multiple is below its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Stability 9
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Profitability 32
Below median
Moderate Growth 45
Around median
Strongest Valuation 88
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
47
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualityMedium
Structural Read

Discounted for Persistent Weakness, Not Recovery

Charter Communications provides broadband, video, and mobile telecommunications services in the United States.

The market prices Charter Communications for ongoing margin and growth weakness, not for a rebound to peer levels. With revenue growth at -2.3% and a stability score of just 14%, the company’s weak top-line and volatile performance indicate that the business is not simply cycling through a temporary dip but is not keeping pace in a shifting sector. In the US telecom sector, the market assigns Charter a discount precisely because it prices in the impact of the structural shift from cord-cutting and aggressive fiber buildouts by competitors—reflecting heightened competitive pressure and persistent revenue headwinds in Charter’s valuation. As a result, Charter trades at a clear discount, with no premium assigned for operational efficiency gains. Only a sustained return to positive revenue growth and margin improvement to peer levels would break the current valuation framing.

AssetNext · 2026-05-13 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how CHTR compares across its peer group

Break down CHTR's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare CHTR with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.