The structural profiles are close, with Deutsche Telekom carrying a narrow edge on stability. The remaining gap is narrow enough that the comparison remains open to different readings. The market setup broadly confirms the structural lead — Deutsche Telekom holds the more constructive position. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Deutsche Telekom's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Stability still does most of the heavy lifting in this comparison.
Both operate in: Telecom Services
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. CHTR and DTE.DE share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Charter Communications and Deutsche Telekom each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The clearest separation appears in stability.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
Deutsche Telekom AG still looks cheaper, even though Charter Communications, Inc. remains structurally stronger.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The stability gap is wide, with the stronger side looking materially steadier through time.
Absolute pricing still looks more supportive for Charter Communications, with a forward P/E that is 7.8 turns lower there.
The main read on stability is clearer than the broader score gap.
Break down the CHTR vs DTE.DE comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how CHTR and DTE.DE each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.