Home Similar Companies Similar to GD Stability Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Stability Profile

Companies with a General Dynamics Corporation-like Stability Profile

25 companies with consistent financial performance and low earnings volatility comparable to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 72 · Updated 2026-04-05 · All companies similar to GD →

Reference
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
Stability Profile score
72

Score range used for matching: 60–84

Companies with a similar financial stability and consistency to General Dynamics Corporation

Ranked by closeness of stability score to GD's reference score of 72. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Stability Profile
#1
RMD · Healthcare similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#2
ACGL · Financial Services similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#3
CTRA · Energy similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#4
FOXA · Communication Services similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#5
MUV2.DE · Financial Services similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#6
ED · Utilities similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#7
COP · Energy similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#8
MDT · Healthcare similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#9
BIM.PA · Healthcare similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#10
SMIN.L · Industrials similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#11
CVX · Energy similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#12
CTEC.L · Healthcare similar →
72(+0)
Analysis
#13
INCY · Healthcare similar →
73(+1)
Analysis
#14
ORNBV.HE · Healthcare similar →
71(−1)
Analysis
#15
GTT.PA · Energy similar →
73(+1)
Analysis
#16
MSFT · Technology similar →
73(+1)
Analysis
#17
GGG · Industrials similar →
71(−1)
Analysis
#18
PTC · Technology similar →
73(+1)
Analysis
#19
KMB · Consumer Defensive similar →
73(+1)
Analysis
#20
NTAP · Technology similar →
71(−1)
Analysis
Compare GD with trajectory matches
Other GD trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for General Dynamics Corporation.

Explore GD in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.