Home Companies KR
Consumer Defensive · Grocery Stores · Peer Analysis

The Kroger Co. (KR) — Structural Peer Analysis

The Kroger Co. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with stability as the main structural pillar while the other dimensions offer less support. The trend is mixed and momentum is weakening. Price action is lagging the structural profile — current market behavior is not yet confirming the structural position.

Updated 2026-04-05 · SP500
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Valuation 38
Below median
Weak Growth 41
Around median
Moderate Profitability 47
Around median
Strongest Stability 77
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
49
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualityMedium

Explore how KR compares across its peer group

Break down KR's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare KR with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.