Home Companies AON
Financial Services · Insurance Brokers · Peer Analysis

Aon plc (AON) — Structural Peer Analysis

Aon plc ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with a broadly solid profile across the main structural dimensions. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.

Updated 2026-04-05 · SP500
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 57
Above median
Weak Profitability 62
Above median
Moderate Stability 64
Above median
Strongest Valuation 77
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
66
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualityMedium

Explore how AON compares across its peer group

Break down AON's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare AON with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.