Portfolio Snapshot
Created on: 2026-04-04
Summary
Total portfolio value
€21,854
Top-3 concentration
Elevated
Top 3 holdings represent 72% of portfolio weight.
Effective N
~5.0 holdings
The portfolio behaves roughly like 5.0 equally sized positions.
How the holdings usually behave
Strongly driven by growth stories
Growth dependency stands at 88 of 100 — the positions react more strongly to shifts in growth expectations than to the currently visible business profile.
3 of 5 positions were entered in the upper range of their 10-year span — 0% of the book.
Summary
- Structural concentration is elevated (Top 3 = 72%)
- Covered holdings show growth-tilted characteristics
- Over the past year the positions individually averaged 42.8% in price swings
Holdings & Structure
Coverage by value
100%
of portfolio value
Holdings
6/6
Holdings
Top 3 concentration
72%
of portfolio weight
These signals are derived from the covered holdings in this portfolio.
6 of 6 holdings fall within the AssetNext analysis universe.
Largest position
MSFT — 25.4%
Largest position represents a significant share of portfolio value.
All Holdings
| # | Ticker | Name | Weight | Peer | Shares | Value | Currency | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | 62 | — | 5,560.00 | EUR | Full | |
| 2 | NOW | ServiceNow, Inc. | 36 | — | 5,170.00 | EUR | Full | |
| 3 | AMZN | Amazon.com, Inc. | 68 | — | 5,112.00 | EUR | Full | |
| 4 | SAP.DE | SAP SE | 50 | — | 2,498.00 | EUR | Full | |
| 5 | CRM | Salesforce, Inc. | 45 | — | 1,864.00 | EUR | Full | |
| 6 | FISV | Fiserv, Inc. | 51 | — | 1,650.00 | EUR | Full |
Geographic & Currency Breakdown
After resolving all ETFs: how your capital distributes across countries and sectors — weighted by effective share. · Breakdown covers 92% of resolved equity
Currency of constituents
Country assigned by company domicile (per-holding reference data), not by revenue source. Listing or fund currency may differ.
How much the market is backing the portfolio right now
This shows whether current price action is backing the profile of your covered holdings — or not.
COVERED BY ALIGNMENT MODEL
100.0%
COVERED DISTRIBUTION
Profile in the mid range — no clear signal either way.
This is the view of right now. The portfolio’s longer-term basic pattern still matters more.
Entry why it matters
Shows where your buy price and today's price sit within each position's long-term range. Works the same way for individual stocks and ETFs.
ENTRY DISTRIBUTION
CURRENT VS ENTRY
Entry context compares your buy price and today’s price with each stock’s long-term range. It shows how high or low your entry looked historically — not what happens next. If the buy price comes from a screenshot, it is back-calculated from the price shown there; “Now” is the current market price (latest available close). “Since buy” is the difference between the two and may differ from your broker’s display, which can be based on a different price snapshot.
Closest comparison index
This is only an outside comparison. You do not need it to understand the portfolio itself.
Fit
Medium
Why this comparison index
Driven by your largest positions MSFT and AMZN — they belong to the Nasdaq 100 and tip the comparison toward it.
This index is only here for comparison. It is not a recommendation.
Portfolio vs Nasdaq 100 Behaviour
How the portfolio looks versus the index
Less diversified than the comparison index
Compared with Nasdaq 100, this portfolio relies on fewer independent return drivers and a narrower set of holdings. · Top-3 share is high: 72%, Only about 5.0 real return drivers, Getting less market support than Nasdaq 100, More swingy than Nasdaq 100
Changes since last snapshot
First snapshot — no comparison possible yet. Changes will become visible from your next snapshot onward.