Home Companies YUM Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Yum! Brands, Inc.

9 companies structurally similar to Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · YUM full analysis →

Companies similar to Yum! Brands, Inc. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in quality. Examples in this group include Domino's Pizza, Inc., O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., NEXT plc.

Reference company
YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
Peer score: 76
Dimension scores
Growth
75
Quality
88
Valuation
60
Stability
83
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
DPZ · Consumer Cyclical
73
#2
ORLY · Consumer Cyclical
75
#3
NXT.L · Consumer Cyclical
58
#4
IHG.L · Consumer Cyclical
68
#5
GAW.L · Consumer Cyclical
72
#6
AZO · Consumer Cyclical
65
#7
ROL · Consumer Cyclical
51
#8
PNDORA.CO · Consumer Cyclical
73
#9
ITX.MC · Consumer Cyclical
60
Direct comparisons — YUM vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Consumer Cyclical rankings

See how Yum! Brands, Inc. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore YUM peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore YUM peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.