Home Companies DPZ
Consumer Cyclical · Restaurants · Peer Analysis

Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) — Structural Peer Analysis

Domino's Pizza, Inc. ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with profitability as the main structural strength, while growth is less supportive than the other dimensions. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure.

Updated 2026-05-17 · SP500
ENTRY TODAY
Lower price zonebelow norm
TODAY (5y history)7th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically lower range and its multiple is below its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 31
Below median
Weak Stability 41
Around median
Moderate Valuation 84
Top 10% of peers
Strongest Profitability 93
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
68
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualityLow
Structural Read

Discounted for Cyclicality, Not Quality

Domino's Pizza, Inc. operates a global pizza delivery and carryout restaurant chain with a significant digital presence.

DPZ is priced as a consumer cyclical, not a quality stock. Despite an operating margin of 18.2%—well above typical quick-service peers—the market responds sharply to quarterly results, as evidenced by a 22.4% one-year drawdown that reflects significant underperformance versus the sector. Because DPZ's revenue growth is closely tied to consumer trends, even solid operating results can trigger price pressure when consumption slows. DPZ combines global scale with digital delivery expertise, distinguishing it from traditional restaurant chains, yet the market reacts more to short-term consumer data than to lasting efficiency. A weak quarter or negative consumer data is enough to drive further repricing.

AssetNext · 2026-04-29 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how DPZ compares across its peer group

Break down DPZ's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare DPZ with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.