Home Companies ULVR.L Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Unilever PLC

9 companies structurally similar to Unilever PLC (ULVR.L) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · ULVR.L full analysis →

Companies similar to Unilever PLC cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in growth. Examples in this group include Kimberly-Clark Corporation, General Mills, Inc., Henkel AG & Co. KGaA.

Reference company
ULVR.L
Unilever PLC
Peer score: 75
Dimension scores
Growth
85
Quality
81
Valuation
63
Stability
76
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
KMB · Consumer Defensive
72
#2
GIS · Consumer Defensive
49
#3
HEN3.DE · Consumer Defensive
57
#4
KVUE · Consumer Defensive
51
#5
RKT.L · Consumer Defensive
81
#6
PG · Consumer Defensive
67
#7
KRZ.IR · Consumer Defensive
47
#8
NESN.SW · Consumer Defensive
54
#9
OR.PA · Consumer Defensive
46
Direct comparisons — ULVR.L vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Consumer Defensive rankings

See how Unilever PLC ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore ULVR.L peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore ULVR.L peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.