Home Companies ATE.PA Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Alten S.A.

7 companies structurally similar to Alten S.A. (ATE.PA) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · ATE.PA full analysis →

Companies similar to Alten S.A. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in valuation. Examples in this group include Bechtle AG, Sopra Steria Group SA, Reply S.p.A..

Reference company
ATE.PA
Alten S.A.
Peer score: 32
Dimension scores
Growth
11
Quality
11
Valuation
77
Stability
17
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
BC8.DE · Technology
43
#2
SOP.PA · Technology
56
#3
REY.MI · Technology
52
#4
NA9.DE · Technology
61
#5
COK.DE · Technology
22
#6
KTN.DE · Technology
58
#7
SCT.L · Technology
70
Direct comparisons — ATE.PA vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Technology rankings

See how Alten S.A. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore ATE.PA peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore ATE.PA peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.