Nagarro SE ranks slightly below the peer group median, with a relatively even profile across the main dimensions. That creates a tension: current price behavior looks stronger than the structural profile would suggest.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Nagarro SE is a global provider of digital product engineering and technology services. The company operates across various industries, focusing on software development and IT consulting.
The market prices Nagarro on recovery probability rather than sustainable earning power, as operational weaknesses and volatile margins dominate. With an EBITDA margin of 13.8%, down from 15.2% the previous year, and a stability & risk score of just 12% for FY25, Nagarro's recent margin declines and higher regulatory costs mean the market consistently applies a discount for every sign of instability, rather than rewarding short-term growth signals. In IT services, margin stability and adaptability to regulatory shifts are critical, but Nagarro shows recurring one-offs and unpredictable profitability. As long as margin trends remain weak, the market continues to assign a discount and does not fully price in short-term growth signals. Only a sustained return to stable EBITDA margins at peer level for at least two quarters would challenge the turnaround narrative.
Break down NA9.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.