UBS Group AG's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | UBSG.SW peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
UBS Group AG vs Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
|
60 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs Standard Chartered PLC
|
41 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs ING Groep N.V.
|
81 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs HSBC Holdings plc
|
76 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs Barclays PLC
|
54 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
|
62 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs Bank of America Corporation
|
73 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs Citigroup Inc.
|
29 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs Wells Fargo & Company
|
49 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
|
42 | Compare → |
|
UBS Group AG vs The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
|
62 | Compare → |
View the complete UBS Group AG report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.