Home Compare MAP.MC vs TCAP.L
Stock Comparison · Structural lead, mixed market

Mapfre vs TP ICAP Group: Which Stock Looks Stronger in 2026?

Mapfre, holds the cleaner structural position, with profitability as the main driver and stability adding further support. The market setup is mixed, without a decisive signal in either direction. The market is not adding a decisive signal either way — the structural read carries the weight.

The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.

Updated 2026-04-05

Profitability still does most of the heavy lifting in this comparison. Mapfre, S.A. leads by 13 points on the overall comparison score.

Trajectory Similarity
0.70
Moderately similar
Peer-set rank: #1
within Mapfre, S.A.'s functional peer set

This comparison is anchored in long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.

This level of similarity points to a meaningful structural match, though not a tight one.

Most of the shared profile comes through recent revenue growth and investment intensity.

Similarity drivers
recent revenue growthinvestment intensity
How to read the score
0.85–1.00 · Very similar0.70–0.84 · Similar0.55–0.69 · Moderately similarbelow 0.55 · Loose match
Peer-Relative Score
MAP.MC
Mapfre, S.A.
58
Peer-Score
Signal qualityMedium
vs
TCAP.L
TP ICAP Group PLC
45
Peer-Score
Signal qualityMedium

Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.

The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.

Dimension spread: MAP.MC vs TCAP.L Profitability 50 11 Stability 71 56 Valuation 84 88 Growth 18 22 MAP.MC TCAP.L
Gap Ranking
#1 Profitability +39
#2 Stability +15
#3 Growth +4
#4 Valuation +4
Price Setup

Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.

Price setup map for MAP.MC and TCAP.L Stronger + cheaper Stronger + richer Weaker + cheaper Weaker + richer MAP.MCTCAP.L Relative valuation Structural strength

The setup is mixed: neither company clearly combines the stronger profile with the more supportive price setup.

Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.

Relative Position vs Comparable Companies
Profitability
On profitability, Mapfre, S.A. is positioned higher in the group, while TP ICAP Group PLC is closer to the middle.
Stability
Both look solid on stability, though Mapfre, S.A. still holds the stronger peer position.
Profitability — Dominant Gap
MAP.MC
50
TCAP.L
11
Gap+39in favour of MAP.MC

Return on equity adds support too, with a 8.4-point advantage.

What keeps the gap from being one-sided

TP ICAP Group PLC still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.

What this means for the comparison

Profitability is the clearest driver, and stability also supports Mapfre, S.A.'s broader structural position.

Explore full peer positioning in AssetNext

Break down the MAP.MC vs TCAP.L comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Explore full breakdown →
Similar profitability-driven comparisons

Explore how MAP.MC and TCAP.L each compare against other companies in their peer groups.

Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.