Home Compare KLAC vs SMHN.DE
Stock Comparison · Industry comparison · Semiconductor Equipment & Mate

KLA vs SUSS MicroTec: Which Stock Looks Stronger in 2026?

KLA holds the cleaner structural position, with profitability as the main driver and growth adding further support. SUSS MicroTec SE does not offset that deficit through any equally strong structural edge elsewhere. The market setup is broadly comparable for both — no clear directional signal from price behavior. The market is not adding a decisive signal either way — the structural read carries the weight.

The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (KLAC: Nasdaq 100, SMHN.DE: HDAX).

Updated 2026-05-17

This is not just a one-metric split: both profitability and growth materially support the lead. The overall score gap is 15 points in favour of KLA Corporation.

INDUSTRY COMPARISON

Both operate in: Semiconductor Equipment & Materials

This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. KLAC and SMHN.DE share the same industry classification.

For a similarity-based comparison, see how KLA and SUSS MicroTec SE each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.

Peer-Relative Score
KLAC
KLA Corporation
47
Peer-Score
Signal qualitylow
Peer basis: Nasdaq 100
vs
SMHN.DE
SUSS MicroTec SE
32
Peer-Score
Signal qualitylow
Peer basis: HDAX

Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.

The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.

Dimension spread: KLAC vs SMHN.DE Profitability 70 39 Stability 47 30 Valuation 45 49 Growth 17 0 KLAC SMHN.DE
Gap Ranking
#1 Profitability +31
#2 Growth +17
#3 Stability +17
#4 Valuation +4
Price Setup

Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.

Price setup map for KLAC and SMHN.DE Stronger + cheaper Stronger + richer Weaker + cheaper Weaker + richer KLACSMHN.DE Relative valuation Structural strength

The setup remains mixed because the stronger profile and the more supportive price setup do not sit on the same side.

Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.

Entry today — historical context

Where KLAC and SMHN.DE each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.

BASED ON 5-YEAR HISTORY KLAC Elevated · above norm 0th 50th 100th 0 pct gap SMHN.DE Elevated · near norm 0th 50th 100th 99th 99th
KLAC (99th percentile) and SMHN.DE (99th percentile) both sit in the upper portion of their own 5-year ranges. The historical entry context is broadly similar for both. This reflects entry timing, not which company is structurally stronger.

Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.

Relative Position vs Comparable Companies
Profitability
On profitability, KLA Corporation ranks near the top of the group; SUSS MicroTec SE sits in the weaker half.
Growth
Neither side looks especially strong on growth, though KLA Corporation still ranks somewhat higher.
Profitability — Dominant Gap
KLAC
70
SMHN.DE
39
Gap+31in favour of KLAC

The profitability lead is mainly driven by a 37-point operating margin advantage.

What keeps the gap from being one-sided

SUSS MicroTec SE still carries lower volatility exposure — that difference is real enough to prevent the comparison from becoming one-sided.

What this means for the comparison

Profitability is the clearest driver, and growth also supports KLA Corporation's broader structural position.

Explore full peer positioning in AssetNext

Break down the KLAC vs SMHN.DE comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Explore full breakdown →
Similar profitability-and-growth comparisons

Explore how KLAC and SMHN.DE each compare against other companies in their peer groups.

Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.