SUSS MicroTec SE's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | SMHN.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Amphenol Corporation
|
64 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Ubiquiti Inc.
|
57 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
|
47 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Somnigroup International Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
|
44 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
|
35 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Carvana Co.
|
44 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Super Micro Computer, Inc.
|
47 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Barry Callebaut AG
|
35 | Compare → |
|
SUSS MicroTec SE vs Rheinmetall AG
|
39 | Compare → |
View the complete SUSS MicroTec SE report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.