International Paper Company holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across growth and valuation. Smurfit Westrock does not offset that deficit through any equally strong structural edge elsewhere. Both sides have seen trend damage — neither carries a clear market edge right now. With both trends damaged, the structural comparison carries most of the weight here.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
Most of the separation is still concentrated in growth. International Paper Company leads by 24 points on the overall comparison score.
Both operate in: Packaging & Containers
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. IP and SW share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how IP and Smurfit Westrock each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Score differences across key dimensions.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
International Paper Company looks stronger on relative valuation, while the broader price setup remains mixed.
Valuation position uses Forward P/E and peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
Growth adds another layer to the lead, with a very wide gap in revenue growth between the two companies.
Valuation also supports the lead, so the result is broader than one isolated gap.
The lead is built on both growth and valuation, making it broader than a single-dimension result.
Break down the IP vs SW comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how IP and SW each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.