International Paper Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | IP peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
International Paper Company vs Smurfit Westrock Plc
|
30 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs Somnigroup International Inc.
|
48 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs Barratt Redrow plc
|
49 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs DSV A/S
|
29 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs Super Micro Computer, Inc.
|
47 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs The Boeing Company
|
43 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs Expand Energy Corporation
|
71 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs ONEOK, Inc.
|
59 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
|
49 | Compare → |
|
International Paper Company vs Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
19 | Compare → |
View the complete International Paper Company report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.