Hannover Rück SE's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | HNR1.DE peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Hannover Rück SE vs Swiss Re AG
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
|
78 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs The Travelers Companies, Inc.
|
66 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs TP ICAP Group PLC
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company
|
42 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs Tryg A/S
|
68 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs SCOR SE
|
40 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs Assurant, Inc.
|
45 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs PayPal Holdings, Inc.
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs Everest Group, Ltd.
|
49 | Compare → |
|
Hannover Rück SE vs Trimble Inc.
|
31 | Compare → |
View the complete Hannover Rück SE report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.