Home Compare EXPD
Peer Analysis

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare EXPD with peers
Comparison EXPD peer score
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Kuehne + Nagel International AG
44 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
58 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Deutsche Post AG
62 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Nexans S.A.
37 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Owens Corning
30 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Umicore SA
57 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
57 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Mueller Industries, Inc.
84 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Rockwell Automation, Inc.
45 Compare →
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. vs Glanbia plc
47 Compare →

Full EXPD analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.