Home Compare BEIJ-B.ST vs EXPD
Stock Comparison · Structural lead, mixed market

Beijer Ref AB (publ) vs Expeditors International of Washington: Which Stock Looks Stronger in 2026?

Expeditors International of Washington holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across profitability and growth. Beijer Ref AB (publ) does not offset that deficit through any equally strong structural edge elsewhere. On the market side, Expeditors International of Washington is in better shape — its trend is intact while Beijer Ref AB (publ)'s trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Expeditors International of Washington's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.

The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (BEIJ-B.ST: STOXX 600, EXPD: S&P 500).

Updated 2026-06-14

This is not just a one-metric split: both profitability and growth materially support the lead. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. leads by 51 points on the overall comparison score.

Trajectory Similarity
0.73
Similar
Peer-set rank: #4
within Beijer Ref AB (publ)'s functional peer set

These two companies are linked by measured long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.

The pair sits on a clearly comparable long-term path, though it is not a near-twin match.

The clearest structural overlap shows up in operating margin level and investment intensity.

Similarity drivers
operating margin levelinvestment intensity
What reduces the match
revenue growth trajectory
How to read the score
0.85–1.00 · Very similar0.70–0.84 · Similar0.55–0.69 · Moderately similarbelow 0.55 · Loose match
Peer-Relative Score
BEIJ-B.ST
Beijer Ref AB (publ)
22
Peer-Score
Signal qualityMedium
Peer basis: STOXX 600
vs
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
73
Peer-Score
Signal qualitylow
Peer basis: S&P 500

Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.

The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.

Dimension spread: BEIJ-B.ST vs EXPD Profitability 7 90 Stability 31 77 Valuation 44 64 Growth 3 56 BEIJ-B.ST EXPD
Gap Ranking
#1 Profitability +83
#2 Growth +53
#3 Stability +46
#4 Valuation +20
Price Setup

Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.

Price setup map for BEIJ-B.ST and EXPD Stronger + cheaper Stronger + richer Weaker + cheaper Weaker + richer BEIJ-B.STEXPD Relative valuation Structural strength

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. looks stronger on relative valuation, while the broader price setup remains mixed.

Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.

Relative Position vs Comparable Companies
Profitability
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. ranks near the top of the group on profitability; Beijer Ref AB (publ) sits in the weaker half.
Growth
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. sits in the stronger part of the group on growth, while Beijer Ref AB (publ) is closer to mid-pack.
Profitability — Dominant Gap
BEIJ-B.ST
7
EXPD
90
Gap+83in favour of EXPD

Capital efficiency adds support, with a 43-point ROIC advantage.

What keeps the gap from being one-sided

Beijer Ref AB (publ) still shows lower market-fundamental divergence, which keeps the wider picture mixed rather than completely one-sided.

What this means for the comparison

The lead is built on both profitability and growth, making it broader than a single-dimension result.

Explore full peer positioning in AssetNext

Break down the BEIJ-B.ST vs EXPD comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Explore full breakdown →
Similar profitability-and-growth comparisons

Explore how BEIJ-B.ST and EXPD each compare against other companies in their peer groups.

Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.