IQVIA holds the cleaner structural position, with valuation as the main driver and stability adding further support. EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme still has the edge on stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. On the market side, IQVIA is in better shape — its trend is intact while EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme's trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — IQVIA's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (EL.PA: STOXX 600, IQV: S&P 500).
The lead is spread across valuation and profitability, rather than sitting in one isolated gap. The overall score gap is 10 points in favour of IQVIA Holdings Inc..
This pair is matched through long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.
The pair shares a valid long-term profile match, but the trajectories are not especially close.
Most of the shared profile comes through revenue stability and margin consistency.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The largest gaps do not all point in the same direction.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
The structural gap is limited here, but current pricing still leans against EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
Where EL.PA and IQV each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.
Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.
The multiple-based pricing edge comes from a forward P/E that is 6.6 turns lower.
Stability still tilts materially toward EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme, which stops the result from looking dominant across the whole profile.
Valuation is the clearest driver of the lead, with stability adding further support — though stability still provides a real counterweight.
Break down the EL.PA vs IQV comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how EL.PA and IQV each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.