Home Compare EL.PA
Peer Analysis

EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare EL.PA with peers
Comparison EL.PA peer score
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Becton, Dickinson and Company
49 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
59 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs IQVIA Holdings Inc.
56 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Fresenius Medical Care AG
51 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
61 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
55 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Eiffage SA
60 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Airbus SE
40 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Wendel
45 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Align Technology, Inc.
49 Compare →
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme vs Renault SA
48 Compare →

Full EL.PA analysis in AssetNext

View the complete EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.