Old Dominion Freight Line holds the cleaner structural position, with growth as the main driver and profitability adding further support. Elisa Oyj still leads on valuation and stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. On the market side, Old Dominion Freight Line is in better shape — its trend is intact while Elisa Oyj's trend has broken down. That puts structure and market broadly in agreement — Old Dominion Freight Line's lead looks more confirmed than conflicted.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels. Peer scores are normalised within each company's primary universe (ELISA.HE: STOXX 600, ODFL: Nasdaq 100).
Growth still does most of the heavy lifting in this comparison. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. leads by 10 points on the overall comparison score.
These two companies are linked by measured long-term financial trajectory similarity within the selected peer universe.
The pair shares a valid long-term profile match, but the trajectories are not especially close.
Most of the shared profile comes through investment intensity and revenue stability.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
The clearest separation appears in growth.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. occupies the cheaper side of the setup map, although Elisa Oyj still holds the stronger structural profile.
Valuation position uses peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
Where ELISA.HE and ODFL each sit in their own 5-year price and valuation history.
Describes historical entry positioning only. Descriptive — not investment advice.
One company is still expanding while the other is contracting, which creates a very wide growth split.
Absolute pricing still looks more supportive for Elisa Oyj, with a forward P/E that is 17.7 turns lower there.
Growth is the clearest driver of the lead, with profitability adding further support — though valuation still provides a real counterweight.
Break down the ELISA.HE vs ODFL comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how ELISA.HE and ODFL each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.