Home Companies ODFL
Industrials · Trucking · Peer Analysis

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) — Structural Peer Analysis

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. ranks near the peer group median, with strong profitability offset by weak growth.

Updated 2026-07-05 · NASDAQ100
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zoneabove norm
TODAY (5y history)95th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range and its multiple is above its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 16
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Valuation 51
Above median
Moderate Stability 57
Above median
Strongest Profitability 86
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
56
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

Premium on Perfection: ODFL’s Benchmark Status Carries Risk

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. provides less-than-truckload freight transportation services across the United States.

ODFL is treated as the benchmark for LTL stability with a premium. With an operating margin of 36%, the company sets the standard for efficiency and service quality in the LTL market, but the market re-prices the stock on small operational deviations: a P/E of 35.2 reflects that even minor operational slips are interpreted as warnings for broader trends. Because ODFL stands out through its margins and execution, each quarterly result is scrutinized as a test of structural strength—so the market prices in the premium as long as flawless execution is delivered, but immediately penalizes any single weak quarter by sharply compressing the premium.

AssetNext · 2026-06-14 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how ODFL compares across its peer group

Break down ODFL's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare ODFL with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.