Home Compare CON.DE
Peer Analysis

Continental Aktiengesellschaft — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Continental Aktiengesellschaft's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare CON.DE with peers
Comparison CON.DE peer score
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs GameStop Corp.
46 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs FLSmidth & Co. A/S
61 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs HIAB.HE
58 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs Holcim AG
41 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs Kuehne + Nagel International AG
44 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
75 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs Hera S.p.A.
52 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs Yara International ASA
62 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs Glanbia plc
47 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
52 Compare →
Continental Aktiengesellschaft vs News Corporation
57 Compare →

Full CON.DE analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Continental Aktiengesellschaft report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.