Home Companies CON.DE
Consumer Cyclical · Auto Parts · Peer Analysis

Continental Aktiengesellschaft (CON.DE) — Structural Peer Analysis

Continental Aktiengesellschaft ranks slightly below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong valuation, but weak profitability and stability. The trend setup is mixed, though short-term momentum remains constructive. That creates a tension: current price behavior looks stronger than the structural profile would suggest.

Updated 2026-05-17 · DAX40
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zonenear norm
TODAY (5y history)75th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range, with its multiple close to its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Stability 15
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Profitability 19
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Growth 57
Above median
Strongest Valuation 86
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
46
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualitylow

Explore how CON.DE compares across its peer group

Break down CON.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare CON.DE with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.