Centene holds the cleaner structural position, with the lead spread across valuation and growth. CVS Health still leads on profitability and stability, which keeps the comparison from looking entirely one-sided. The market setup is currently leaning toward CVS Health, which does not confirm the structural lead. That leaves a split case: the structural lead stays with Centene, but the market is not currently confirming it.
The comparison is based on similar long-term financial trajectories, not sector labels.
This is not just a one-metric split: both valuation and growth materially support the lead. The overall score gap is 11 points in favour of Centene Corporation.
Both operate in: Healthcare Plans
This comparison is based on industry proximity, not on functional trajectory similarity. CNC and CVS share the same industry classification.
For a similarity-based comparison, see how Centene and CVS Health each position within their functional peer groups in AssetNext.
Scores reflect position relative to comparable companies with similar long-term financial trajectories.
Score differences across key dimensions.
Left means cheaper relative valuation. Higher means stronger structure.
Centene Corporation and CVS Health Corporation look relatively close on structure, but the price setup still leans toward Centene Corporation.
Valuation position uses Forward P/E and peer-relative PE percentile (idx_pct_pe) where available.
The peer-relative valuation gap is very wide, with the stronger side also looking meaningfully cheaper.
Capital efficiency also runs the other way, with a 37-point ROIC edge acting as a real counterforce.
The lead is built on both valuation and growth — though profitability still provides a counterweight.
Break down the CNC vs CVS comparison across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
Explore how CNC and CVS each compare against other companies in their peer groups.
Rule-based, descriptive analysis only. Derived from peer percentile dimensions. Not investment advice. Peer groups are determined algorithmically based on structural similarity — not by sector classification alone.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.