Home Compare ADM
Peer Analysis

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — Peer Companies & Stock Comparisons

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.

Compare ADM with peers
Comparison ADM peer score
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Target Corporation
59 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Tyson Foods, Inc.
35 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Bunzl plc
54 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation
70 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Hormel Foods Corporation
44 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Imperial Brands PLC
76 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs The J. M. Smucker Company
65 Compare →
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company vs Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
55 Compare →

Full ADM analysis in AssetNext

View the complete Archer-Daniels-Midland Company report including all peer dimensions.

Open in AssetNext →

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.