Accor SA's functional peer companies ranked by peer score — growth, valuation, profitability and stability compared.
| Comparison | AC.PA peer score | |
|---|---|---|
|
Accor SA vs InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
|
68 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Marriott International, Inc.
|
55 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation
|
57 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
|
56 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Vistry Group PLC
|
43 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Toll Brothers, Inc.
|
59 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Baker Hughes Company
|
61 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Konecranes Plc
|
66 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Compagnie Financière Richemont SA
|
68 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Carrier Global Corporation
|
32 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs PulteGroup, Inc.
|
58 | Compare → |
|
Accor SA vs Jungheinrich Aktiengesellschaft
|
55 | Compare → |
View the complete Accor SA report including all peer dimensions.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.