Siltronic AG ranks among the weaker positions in its peer group, with a relatively even profile across the main dimensions. That creates a tension: current price behavior looks stronger than the structural profile would suggest.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Siltronic AG produces semiconductor wafers, focusing on the electronics industry. The company specializes in 300 mm wafers for chip manufacturing.
The market prices Siltronic on recovery potential and short-term demand spikes, not on sustainable returns or peer-level quality. This is reflected in the way investors discount the stock in response to its weak 3.2% ROIC (well below sector average in FY25) and a 4.7% decline in sales growth (revenue declined in FY25), showing that the market actively penalizes Siltronic for lacking stability or quality, rather than rewarding these attributes with a premium. Siltronic is heavily focused on 300 mm wafers, but the closure of its SD line means lost share in smaller wafers and less diversification than many semiconductor peers. Only a return to double-digit ROIC and sustained revenue growth over multiple quarters would break the recovery-play framing.
Break down WAF.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.