Home Companies ORCL
Technology · Software - Infrastructure · Peer Analysis

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) — Structural Peer Analysis

Oracle Corporation ranks in an above-average position in its peer group, with stability as the main structural constraint. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure. Price action is not yet fully confirming the underlying structural profile.

Updated 2026-08-16 · RUSSELL1000
ENTRY TODAY
Elevated price zonebelow norm
TODAY (5y history)70th pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a historically elevated range, while its multiple is below its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Stability 23
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Valuation 63
Above median
Moderate Profitability 83
Top 10% of peers
Strongest Growth 83
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
65
Peer-Score
Above-average peer position
Signal qualitylow
Structural Read

AI Growth Story Carries a Fragile Premium

Oracle Corporation develops and sells database software, cloud infrastructure, and enterprise software products. The company is a major provider to large enterprises and increasingly focuses on AI and cloud integration.

Oracle trades as an AI-driven growth story, not a value anchor. The market prices the stock to react acutely to cyclical shifts in cloud and AI momentum—every guidance update is treated as a referendum on the growth narrative, with 1Y volatility at 38.5% (top decile among megacap peers) showing how even minor deviations drive sharp moves. Operating margin stands at 41%, well above the peer median, underscoring strong profitability. Oracle differentiates itself via multicloud and AI integration, especially in healthcare, but the market rewards momentum and narrative continuity over stable cash flows. A single weak cloud quarter is enough to trigger a sharp rerating.

AssetNext · 2026-08-09 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how ORCL compares across its peer group

Break down ORCL's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare ORCL with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.