Marriott International, Inc. ranks near the peer group median, with a relatively even profile across the main dimensions. Price behavior is partially reflecting the structural picture, with a moderate gap remaining.
Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest
Marriott International operates a global portfolio of hotels, focusing on luxury and lifestyle brands through a franchising model.
Marriott’s valuation premium stands on shaky ground despite strong results. The company posts an operating margin of 59%, placing it in the top decile for sector-leading efficiency. Yet the forward P/E of 29.9x, well above the peer median, shows the market is pricing in continued outperformance and growth. As a global hotel franchiser focused on luxury and lifestyle brands, Marriott's valuation depends on sustaining premium pricing and growth in cyclical markets. The market prices each quarterly update with heightened sensitivity, reflecting ongoing doubts about the durability of the premium. Strong company, but the premium stays nervous.
Break down MAR's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.
This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.
AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.
Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.
Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.
Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.