Home Companies GME
Consumer Cyclical · Specialty Retail · Peer Analysis

GameStop Corp. (GME) — Structural Peer Analysis

GameStop Corp. ranks slightly below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong profitability, but weak growth and stability. The market setup has weakened, with clear trend damage and relative performance under pressure.

Updated 2026-08-16 · RUSSELL1000
ENTRY TODAY
Neutral price zonebelow norm
TODAY (5y history)33rd pct today
0th50th100th
Today the stock sits in a broadly neutral part of its long-term range and its multiple is below its own norm.
Describes where today's entry sits in the stock's own long-term price and valuation history. Descriptive only. Not investment advice.
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 6
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Stability 14
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Valuation 54
Above median
Strongest Profitability 84
Top 10% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
46
Peer-Score
Mid-range peer position
Signal qualityHigh
Structural Read

GameStop: Discount for a Reason

GameStop Corp. is a retailer focused on video games, collectibles, and gaming merchandise. The company operates physical and online stores across North America and internationally.

The market prices GameStop based on recovery probability and restructuring risk rather than sustainable earnings power like established retail peers. With an operating margin of just 1.8% and ROIC at 2.1%, the company’s fundamentals are weaker than most in the sector, and these numbers show that short-term profit spikes do not resolve the core business pressure from digital competition. Because GameStop faces a steeper challenge than other retailers from the shift toward digital distribution and must adapt its business model more rapidly, the market imposes a persistent valuation discount on the stock, reacting strongly to any signs of restructuring risk or temporary earnings improvements. Only a sustained increase in capital returns over multiple quarters and a successful business model transformation would change the market’s peer-relative framing.

AssetNext · 2026-08-05 · Rule-based and descriptive. Not investment advice.

Explore how GME compares across its peer group

Break down GME's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare GME with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.