Home Similar Companies Similar to HST Margin & Quality Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Margin & Quality Profile

Companies with a Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.-like Margin & Quality Profile

25 companies with high margin and capital efficiency comparable to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 32 · Updated 2026-05-17 · All companies similar to HST →

Reference
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Margin & Quality Profile score
32

Score range used for matching: 20–44

Companies with a similar margin and capital efficiency profile to Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Ranked by closeness of quality score to HST's reference score of 32. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Margin & Quality Profile
#1
F · Consumer Cyclical similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#2
HAS · Consumer Cyclical similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#3
SMCI · Technology similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#4
TRI · Industrials similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#5
AMH · Real Estate similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#6
CHTR · Communication Services similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#7
JUN3.DE · Industrials similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#8
DRS · Industrials similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#9
AKRBP.OL · Energy similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#10
BA · Industrials similar →
32(+0)
Analysis
#11
NBIX · Healthcare similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#12
ORNBV.HE · Healthcare similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#13
YAR.OL · Basic Materials similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#14
FDX · Industrials similar →
31(−1)
Analysis
#15
AR · Energy similar →
31(−1)
Analysis
#16
QCOM · Technology similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#17
JDEP.AS · Consumer Defensive similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#18
GET.PA · Industrials similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#19
HII · Industrials similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
#20
VZ · Communication Services similar →
33(+1)
Analysis
Compare HST with trajectory matches
Other HST trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc..

Explore HST in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.