Home Companies RHM.DE
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · Peer Analysis

Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) — Structural Peer Analysis

Rheinmetall AG ranks below the peer group median, with a split structural profile: strong profitability, but weak growth and valuation. Trend conditions have deteriorated, without yet reaching an extreme downside state. Recent price action is broadly in line with the structural positioning.

Updated 2026-04-05 · DAX40
Dimension Profile

Peer-relative scores, weakest to strongest

Weakest Growth 12
Bottom 25% of peers
Weak Valuation 19
Bottom 25% of peers
Moderate Stability 51
Above median
Strongest Profitability 69
Top 25% of peers
Peer-Relative Score
39
Peer-Score
Below-average peer position
Signal qualityHigh

Explore how RHM.DE compares across its peer group

Break down RHM.DE's position across all dimensions with the full interactive tool.

Open full peer comparison →
Compare RHM.DE with peers

This analysis is rule-based and descriptive. Peer-relative scores are derived from functional peer group comparisons using publicly available financial data. Scores reflect structural positioning only and do not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation, or a forecast of future performance. AssetNext peer scores are recalculated periodically as new data becomes available.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.