Home Similar Companies Similar to HLT Stability Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Stability Profile

Companies with a Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.-like Stability Profile

25 companies with consistent financial performance and low earnings volatility comparable to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 65 · Updated 2026-05-17 · All companies similar to HLT →

Reference
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Stability Profile score
65

Score range used for matching: 53–77

Companies with a similar financial stability and consistency to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

Ranked by closeness of stability score to HLT's reference score of 65. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Stability Profile
#1
RRC · Energy similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#2
RJF · Financial Services similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#3
BUCN.SW · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#4
FTI · Energy similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#5
VIK · Consumer Cyclical similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#6
UNP · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#7
TEN.MI · Energy similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#8
ALNY · Healthcare similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#9
KOG.OL · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#10
HON · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#11
HEI · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#12
DKSH.SW · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#13
CHD · Consumer Defensive similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#14
RBA · Industrials similar →
65(+0)
Analysis
#15
AGNC · Real Estate similar →
64(−1)
Analysis
#16
NLY · Real Estate similar →
64(−1)
Analysis
#17
ZURN.SW · Financial Services similar →
66(+1)
Analysis
#18
LI.PA · Real Estate similar →
64(−1)
Analysis
#19
FRT · Real Estate similar →
64(−1)
Analysis
#20
SCT.L · Technology similar →
64(−1)
Analysis
Compare HLT with trajectory matches
Other HLT trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc..

Explore HLT in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.