Home Similar Companies Similar to HLT Margin & Quality Profile
Trajectory Analysis · Margin & Quality Profile

Companies with a Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.-like Margin & Quality Profile

25 companies with high margin and capital efficiency comparable to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) — identified by structural trajectory analysis, not sector labels alone.

Reference score: 84 · Updated 2026-04-05 · All companies similar to HLT →

Reference
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
Margin & Quality Profile score
84

Score range used for matching: 72–96

Companies with a similar margin and capital efficiency profile to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

Ranked by closeness of quality score to HLT's reference score of 84. Delta shown in parentheses.

# Company Margin & Quality Profile
#1
JKHY · Technology similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#2
OTIS · Industrials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#3
EME · Industrials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#4
NTAP · Technology similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#5
NVR · Consumer Cyclical similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#6
WST · Healthcare similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#7
ACN · Technology similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#8
ECL · Basic Materials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#9
COKE · Consumer Defensive similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#10
TDG · Industrials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#11
MRK.DE · Healthcare similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#12
BEAN.SW · Industrials similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#13
BESI.AS · Technology similar →
84(+0)
Analysis
#14
EXEL · Healthcare similar →
83(−1)
Analysis
#15
LI.PA · Real Estate similar →
85(+1)
Analysis
#16
ZURN.SW · Financial Services similar →
83(−1)
Analysis
#17
MNST · Consumer Defensive similar →
85(+1)
Analysis
#18
LMP.L · Real Estate similar →
85(+1)
Analysis
#19
QCOM · Technology similar →
83(−1)
Analysis
#20
TXN · Technology similar →
85(+1)
Analysis
Compare HLT with trajectory matches
Other HLT trajectory pages

Full trajectory analysis in AssetNext

Interactive peer comparison, trajectory view and live data for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc..

Explore HLT in AssetNext →

Trajectory similarity is rule-based and descriptive — not investment advice. Companies are matched by score proximity on a single dimension; this does not imply equivalence across all financial characteristics. Based on peer-relative structural scores in the AssetNext universe.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.