Home Companies STMN.SW Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Straumann Holding AG

11 companies structurally similar to Straumann Holding AG (STMN.SW) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-05-17 · STMN.SW full analysis →

Companies similar to Straumann Holding AG cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in quality. Examples in this group include West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., bioMérieux S.A., Waters Corporation.

Reference company
STMN.SW
Straumann Holding AG
Peer score: 38
Dimension scores
Growth
17
Quality
70
Valuation
34
Stability
17
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
WST · Healthcare
62
#2
BIM.PA · Healthcare
43
#3
WAT · Healthcare
34
#4
HIK.L · Healthcare
60
#5
MTD · Healthcare
63
#6
HCA · Healthcare
68
#7
SFZN.SW · Healthcare
52
#8
A · Healthcare
52
#9
ERF.PA · Healthcare
55
#10
ROG.SW · Healthcare
70
#11
IPN.PA · Healthcare
44
Direct comparisons — STMN.SW vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Healthcare rankings

See how Straumann Holding AG ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore STMN.SW peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore STMN.SW peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Because scores are peer-relative, the same company can have slightly different scores in different index universes. On comparison pages, both companies are shown within their shared peer universe wherever possible — so the scores are directly comparable. The peer basis is stated on each score card.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.