Home Companies ROK Similar companies
Peer Cluster · Structural similarity

Companies with a Similar Profile to Rockwell Automation, Inc.

11 companies structurally similar to Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) — identified by peer analysis across revenue dynamics, margin profile, capital efficiency and growth patterns. Not based on sector labels alone.

Updated 2026-04-05 · ROK full analysis →

Companies similar to Rockwell Automation, Inc. cluster around comparable structural characteristics, with the strongest visible overlap typically appearing in growth. Examples in this group include The Weir Group PLC, Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Carlisle Companies Incorporated.

Reference company
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Peer score: 51
Dimension scores
Growth
94
Quality
40
Valuation
44
Stability
35
Functionally similar companies — ranked by peer score
# Company Peer score
#1
WEIR.L · Industrials
42
#2
PH · Industrials
57
#3
CSL · Industrials
49
#4
ROR.L · Industrials
56
#5
OTIS · Industrials
74
#6
VALMT.HE · Industrials
56
#7
METSO.HE · Industrials
47
#8
TOM.OL · Industrials
31
#9
WSO · Industrials
41
#10
RS1.L · Industrials
54
#11
CMI · Industrials
64
Direct comparisons — ROK vs peers

Peer-relative comparison across valuation, quality, growth and stability.

Industrials rankings

See how Rockwell Automation, Inc. ranks within its sector on specific metrics.

Explore ROK peers in AssetNext

Full interactive peer view with similarity scores, compare tool and portfolio integration.

Explore ROK peers →

Peer similarity is rule-based and descriptive only. Based on structural analysis of revenue, margins, capital intensity and growth patterns. Not investment advice.

How AssetNext Peer Scores Work

AssetNext scores reflect each company's structural position within its functional peer group — not a ranking against all stocks simultaneously. Peers are identified by similarity across eight financial dimensions, including revenue growth trajectory, margin structure, capital intensity, and earnings stability. A score of 75 means the company ranks in the top quartile within its own peer group, not the entire market.

Four dimension scores drive the overall peer score: Growth (revenue trajectory and expansion dynamics), Quality (margin structure and capital efficiency), Valuation (peer-relative pricing on standard multiples), and Stability (earnings consistency and financial predictability). Each dimension is scored 0–100 relative to the peer group, then combined into an overall peer score using equal weighting.

Scores are recalculated periodically as underlying financial data is updated. All analysis is descriptive and rule-based — AssetNext describes structural realities and never issues buy, sell or hold recommendations.